Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Journal of Family History
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0363199009337394v1
34/3/251    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pargas, D. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Article

Disposing of Human Property: American Slave Families and Forced Separation in Comparative Perspective

Damian Alan Pargas*

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: d.a.pargas{at}uu.nl.


   Abstract
Virtually no slave family in the nineteenth-century American South was completely safeguarded from forced separation, yet the extent of family breakups throughout the slave states remains far from clear. Much of the historical debate has focused on the domestic slave trade and its effect on slave family stability, thereby downplaying other methods of forced separation, which were surely just as disruptive, such as local sales and estate divisions. Moreover, few historians have approached the issue of forced separation from a comparative perspective. This article examines the threat of forced separation for slave families living in two distinct communities of the antebellum South, namely, northern Virginia and southern Louisiana. Concluding that the threat of forced separation was inextricably linked to the nature of regional slave-based agriculture, this study shows that time and place mattered and that the threat of forced separation varied for slave families living in different communities.

First published on May 29, 2009, doi:10.1177/0363199009337394

Journal of Family History 2009;34:251.

A more recent version of this article appeared on July 1, 2009


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?